Mike Rose: New Edition of Book Examines Educational Inequality, Economic Focus, Character Education - UCLA School of Education & Information Studies
UCLA staff
UCLA School of Education & Information Studies·2014
Another development is the resurgence of character education, that is, a renewed interest in trying to teach children certain character qualities like perseverance, flexibility, positive thinking, and, the new buzzword, “grit.” The focus of character education these days is on poor children, the idea being that if they had more of these characteristics, they would fare better against the assaults of poverty.
Character education is part of any educational system. If you look at the McGuffey Readers that were used in the United States in the 19th Century, they are imbued with ethical maxims. It’s a good thing for schools to be concerned with the development of traits like perseverance and flexibility, of course. What concerns me about the current rush to character education is that it, in some cases, is offered as a solution to the achievement gap. So instead of policy to address poverty, we have these educational and psychological interventions for poor kids.
Overall, my biggest concern, the central idea of “Why School?,” is that the purpose of education in the United States has gotten so narrow. Education is more than just a technocratic and economic enterprise, which is the message you get from the educational policy that has been in place for several decades. Everything you read from the state or federal government justifies education for its economic payoff, both for society and the individual. National reform movements have promulgated technocratic fixes, whether through standardized test scores, quantitative methods to evaluate teachers, or ways to structure schools that are more in line with management principles than educational principles. A whole generation has come of age not hearing any other way to think about school.
“We’ve lost hope in the public sphere and grab at market-based and private solutions, which undercut the sharing of obligation and risk and keep us scrambling for individual advantage. Though we pride ourselves as a nation of opportunity and a second chance, our social policies can be terribly ungenerous… We’ve narrowed the purpose of schooling to economic competitiveness, our kids becoming economic indicators. And we’ve reduced our definition of human development and achievement—that miraculous growth of intelligence, sensibility, and the discovery of the world—to a test score.”