Oldest and Highest Rated Papers
Advanced filtersTopic: AllExperimental
Topic
Topics are auto-detected from title, abstract, and metadata and may be imperfect.
In Defense of Embarrassment - muses & makings
muses and makings
Substack·2025
How embarrassment shaped our evolution, and why we need it more than ever in the age of performance.
★ 4.0 (1)
View paper →Dancing With The Gods
Eric S Raymond
1995
Portrait of the Author as a Young Mystic
★ 4.0 (1)
View paper →Replication of the Auditing Game Model Organism
Abhay Sheshadri, Rohan Gupta, Kei Nishimura-Gasparian, Rowan Wang, Johannes Treutlein Sam Marks
Anthropic Blog·2025
No abstract available
★ 4.0 (1)
View paper →“A Morbid Longing for the Picturesque”: The Pursuit of Beauty in Donna Tartt’s The Secret History
Charles Perseus D’Aniello
No abstract available
★ 4.0 (1)
View paper →The AI revolution is here. Will the economy survive the transition?
Michael Burry
Substack·2026
The man who predicted the 2008 crash, Anthropic’s co-founder, and a leading AI podcaster jump into a Google doc to debate the future of AI—and, possibly, our lives
★ 4.0 (1)
View paper →Is There a Thing Called Moral Equality? (And Does It Matter if There Isn’t?)
Andrea Sangiovanni
How Can We Be Equals?·2024·2 citations
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>A commitment to moral equality is everywhere accepted as a foundation stone of liberal moral and political philosophy. Yet it is often very unclear what such commitment, in fact, commits us to. In this chapter, I argue three main points. First, I argue that it is unclear whether it is the same commitment at the heart of predominant versions of consequentialism and non-consequentialism. Second, I argue that the reference to equality is redundant in the most common formulations. Third, I argue that we ought to distinguish, more clearly than has been done so far, the role of the commitment in debates on animal ethics and in debates on social equality.</jats:p>
★ 4.0 (1)
View paper →