Newest and Lowest Rated Papers
Advanced filtersTopic: AllExperimental
Topic
Topics are auto-detected from title, abstract, and metadata and may be imperfect.
Pseudorandom Sets in Grassmann Graph have Near-Perfect Expansion
Subhash Khot, Dor Minzer, Muli Safra
eccc.weizmann.ac.il
We prove that pseudorandom sets in Grassmann graph have near-perfect expansion as hypothesized in [DKKMS-2]. This completes
the proof of the 2-to-2 Games Conjecture (albeit with imperfect completeness) as proposed in [KMS, DKKMS-1], along with a
contribution from [BKT].
The Grassmann graph Grglobal contains induced subgraphs Grlocal that are themselves isomorphic to Grassmann graphs of lower orders.
A set is called pseudorandom if its density is o(1) inside all subgraphs Grlocal whose order is O(1) lower than that of Grglobal.
We prove that pseudorandom sets have expansion 1−o(1), greatly extending the results and techniques in [DKKMS-2].
No ratings yet
View paper →The People's Tribunal: The Antithesis of Justice
Dorothy Thompson
American Bar Association Journal·1954
Addressing the Section of Judicial Administration during the Diamond Jubilee Meeting of the Association last summer, Dorothy Thompson, well-known author and lecturer, called attention to the revival by the Communists of the concept of
No ratings yet
View paper →Motivating the Online Learner Using Keller's ARCS Model
Natalie B. Milman, Jeffrey Wessmiller
Distance Learning·2020
No abstract available
No ratings yet
View paper →Philology, Allegory, and the Dating of<i>Beowulf</i>
Leonard Neidorf
Studia Neophilologica·2015·9 citations
No abstract available
No ratings yet
View paper →‘If I Would Stay Alive, I Would Be Their Voice’: On the Legitimacy of International People's Tribunals
Aldo Zammit Borda, Stefan Mandelbaum
The Modern Law Review·2022
<jats:p>In recent years there has been a proliferation of People's Tribunals (PTs), promising to address atrocities that have fallen through the net of a statist international legal order. However, the status of such informal tribunals has remained controversial in both literature and practice. The dominant view has been that PTs simply lack legitimate authority. Positing that, in the language game of legitimacy, PTs are put on a perpetual argumentative backfoot, this article examines aspects of their input, process and output legitimacy. It is argued that the right of victims‐survivors to be heard reigns supreme and it is in upholding that right that the authority of PTs is legitimised. In the current state of international justice, PTs constitute indispensable, quasi‐judicial institutions that bridge gaps in access to justice, challenge official narratives (or silences) about atrocities and, potentially, open up new avenues towards justice and recognition.</jats:p>
No ratings yet
View paper →