Validity and Reproducibility of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire for Measuring Intakes of Foods and Food Groups

Xiao Gu, Dong D Wang, Laura Sampson, Junaidah B Barnett, Eric B Rimm, Meir J Stampfer, Luc Djousse, Bernard Rosner, Walter C Willett

American Journal of Epidemiology1/8/2024·DOI·Read paper

Abstract

Abstract We evaluated the validity and reproducibility of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for measuring intakes of 149 foods and 25 food groups among 736 participants of the Women’s Lifestyle Validation Study (WLVS, 2010–2012) and 649 participants of the Men’s Lifestyle Validation Study (MLVS, 2011–2013). Validity of the FFQ compared with two 7-day dietary records measured 6 months apart and the reproducibility between 2 FFQs administered 1 year apart (FFQ1 and FFQ2) were assessed using Spearman correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients. The average 1-year reproducibility of FFQ-measured foods was 0.64 in both the WLVS and MLVS. Reproducibility of the food groups (mean = 0.71 among women and 0.72 among men) was generally higher than that for individual foods. Among women, the average validity correlation for individual foods was 0.59 when comparing FFQ2 with the 7-day dietary records. Among men, the corresponding average validity correlation was 0.61. Compared with individual foods, food groups had slightly higher validity correlations in both women (range, 0.45–0.92; mean = 0.61) and men (range, 0.46–0.88; mean = 0.65). This study reaffirms that the FFQ performs well in measuring most foods and food groups and provides data to adjust for measurement errors in epidemiologic studies of foods and food groups.

Make this part of your paper trail

Save this paper to a shelf, write a review, and keep your own notes.

Community Ratings

★4(1 rating)

★★★★★

1 rating

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this paper!